You can examine Levene's test for homogeneity to more formally test which of the following assumptions?
You use Levene's test for homogeneity in PROC GLM to verify the assumption of equal variances in a one-way ANOVA model.
Given the following output, is there sufficient evidence to reject the assumption of equal variances?
Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Weight Variance
ANOVA of Squared Deviations from Group Means
Source
DF
Sum of
Squares
Mean
Squares
F Value
Pr > F
Brand
1
9.237E-7
9.237E-7
1.12
0.2942
Error
78
0.000065
8.283R-7
The p-value of 0.2942 is greater than 0.05, so you fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the variances are equal.
Given the following SAS output, is there sufficient evidence to reject the hypothesis of equal means?
Source
DF
Sum of
Squares
Mean
Squares
F Value
Pr > F
Brand
1
0.03033816
0.03033816
51.02
<.001
Error
79
0.04638442
0.00059467
Corrected Total
80
0.07672257
The p-value of <.001 is less than 0.05, so you would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the means between the two brands are significantly different.
Dunnett's method compares all possible pairs of means.
The Tukey method compares all possible pairs of means. Dunnett's method compares all categories to a control group.
Which of the following phrases describes the model sums of squares, or SSM, in one-way ANOVA?
SSM is the variability explained by the predictor variable, and therefore, it measures the variability between the groups.
Based on the following correlation matrix, what type of relationship do Performance and RunTime have?
Pearson Correlation Coefficients, N = 31
Prob > |r| under H0: Rho=0
Performance
RunTime
Age
Performance
1.00000
-0.82049
-0.71257
<.0001
<.0001
Error
-0.82049
1.00000
0.19523
<.0001
0.2926
Corrected Total
-0.71257
0.19523
1.00000
<.0001
0.2926
The correlation coefficient for the relationship between Performance and RunTime is -0.82049, which is negative. It's also close to -1, which makes it a relatively strong relationship.
In the simple linear regression model, what does β1 represent?
Y = β0 + β1X + ε
β1 is the slope parameter, which is the average change in Y for a 1-unit change in X.
Which of the following statements describes a positive linear relationship between two variables?
The more I eat, the less I want to exercise.
The more salty snacks I eat, the more water I want to drink.
No matter how much I exercise, I still weigh the same.
In statement 2, the amount of salty snacks eaten and thirst have a positive linear relationship. As the values of one variable (amount of salty snacks eaten) increase, the values of the other variable (thirst) increase as well.
What output does the following program produce?
proc corr data=stat1.bodyfat2 nosimple
plots(only)=scatter(nvar=all);
var Age Weight Height;
run;
By default, PROC CORR produces a table of correlations, which can be a correlation matrix, depending on your program. The NOSIMPLE option suppresses printing of the simple descriptive statistics for each variable. To request individual scatter plots, you specify the PLOTS=SCATTER option. After the keyword SCATTER, NVAR=ALL specifies that all the variables listed in the VAR statement be displayed in the plots
Given the following PROC REG output and assuming a significance level of 0.05, which of the following statements is true? Select all that apply.
Analysis of Variance
Source
DF
Sum of
Squares
Mean
Squares
F Value
Pr > F
Model
1
119.72668
119.72668
2.00
0.1585
Error
250
14959
59.83716
Corrected Total
251
15079
Root MSE
7.73545
R-Square
0.0079
Dependent Mean
18.93849
Adj R-Sq
0.0040
Coeff Var
40.84511
Parameter Estimates
Variable
DF
Parameter
Estimate
Standard
Error
t Value
Pr >|t|
Intercept
1
32.16542
9.36350
3.44
0.0007
Height
1
-0.18856
0.13330
-1.41
0.1585
The R-square value indicates that the model explains less than 1% of the variation in the response variable. With a p-value of 0.1585, Height is not statistically significant for predicting the values of the response variable. Likewise, the p-value of 0.1585 for the model indicates that you should fail to reject the null hypothesis.